托福写作真题：2.14~2.18 家考写作题目汇总+考情分析

2021-08-04 12:52:35 来源：网络 作者：朗阁小编

这周的托福写作题目很不简单！ 除了*，二套写作难度还算温和外， 第三~七套，基本上都是近期考过的难题大集合！ 但我们也要注意到，重复的题目基本都是2020年~2021年这2年的。审题注意点： 1. 时态：是未来的20年，在题库的时候，一般使用将来时态. 2. leisure time: 没有工作/任务的时间. (<牛津双语字典>) 3. 现象题型：可以从 工作量，科技发展，人们意识等方面分析.

Twenty years from now, people will have more leisure time (free time) than they do today. 

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.

难度系数：⭐️⭐️

Do you agree or disagree with the statement:

When students study these days, many of them also do other things at the same time, for example, use their phones, spend time on the Internet, or listen to music. Do you agree or disagree that such activities have a bad effect on learning? 

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.

Some people believe that the media (for example, television, radio, newspaper, or Internet news sources) are less concerned nowadays with presenting accurate facts than they were in the past; these people argue that the media today often present incorrect information about news stories and that this causes problems for the public. Do you agree with this view? Why or why not?

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.

难度系数：⭐️⭐️⭐️

这道题重复了2020.10月*周家考题目。

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? 

Governments should not provide any financial support to artists (for example, painters, writers, musicians, and filmmakers); all artists should support themselves. 

Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 

Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples

审题分析

1. 利弊题型.—分析政府这样做的好、坏结果

2. 可行的角度（根据写作团讲解的，从不同涉及对象的角度分析

--政府不给资金扶持，对艺术家的影响。

好处：给与他们创作的自由，不受政府的干扰。

坏处：很多年轻/不出名的艺术家可能生活很贫困。

--政府不给资金扶持，对艺术行业的影响。

坏处：无法吸引人们从事这个行业，不利于艺术行业的繁荣：产生不了好的作品*给人们欣赏。

--政府不给资金扶持，对政府本身的影响：

好处：减少了政府自身的经济压力。政府的资金有限，资助了艺术家们可能就没有足够的钱去资助更需要帮助的人们the disadvantaged… 。

To benefit millions of people, governments sometimes build large structures such as new roads or new dams in places where people live or work.  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is always right for governments to request people to move out of their houses or businesses to provide spaces for the construction of large structures.

1. 政府话题. 主要思考的角度：① 政策是否能有利于大部分人民生活福利*+② 政策的成本是否过大。

2. “居民楼和工作大楼的搬迁”—现在各个城市都有这种现象。大家可以联系自己实际来分析。

-- 比如，①要赔偿给原居民的补偿款和搬迁费，可能就远远大于一条道路的修建费用。

--比如，② 让这些居民和公司再重新找地方居住和办公，非常麻烦。居民要离开自己从小长到大的熟悉的社区，迁移到陌生的地方。公司也要离开原本客户熟悉的位置，再搬到其他地方。这个过程中不仅会丢失客户，还有可能无法建立新的客户群体。

--比如，③ 在修建过程中，噪音，来往运输石料，水泥等给周围的居民带来很多的不方便，严重影响人们的正常生活。

3. “修建big structures: roads, river dams”: 道路的扩建可以方便人民的日常出行，缓解城市拥堵。修水坝可以发电降低电费，缓解洪水期对周围居民的影响。

如果你对托福学习 有兴趣，请联系我们的老师~