首页 > > > > 雅思考试写作范文之双边类

雅思考试写作范文之双边类

2019-08-19 18:52:47

来源：网络

作者：mengli

今天小编即将为大家分享的是“雅思考试写作范文?之双边类”，希望能够对大家有所帮助!有兴趣的小伙伴赶快和小编一起来看一下吧!

　　今天小编即将为大家分享的是“雅思考试写作范文之双边类”，希望能够对大家有所帮助!有兴趣的小伙伴赶快和小编一起来看一下吧!

雅思考试写作范文之双边类

　　双边类 – 社会话题

　　Some people think the responsibility of medicine companies is to spend money on researching medicines for people from poorer countries, while others think the main responsibility of medicine companies is to make money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

　　题目大意：

　　有人认为制药公司有责任为穷国家研发药品。其他人认为制药公司的主要目的是挣钱。讨论双边并给出你的观点。

　　思路：

　　双边讨论类的题目，可以自由讨论双方各自的利弊。这两个观点中，都有合理性，但也各有偏颇;

　　甲方：有人认为制药公司有责任为穷国家研发药品，这种观点的合理性是从病人的角度来看是合理的;

　　乙方：其他人认为制药公司的主要责任是挣钱。这种观点从厂商的角度考虑是合理的;

　　我的观点就是双方都有道理，只是对同一个问题的角度不同;

　　关键词

　　spend money on researching medicines for people from poorer countries: 站在穷人的角度，讨论降低医疗成本和企业社会责任的重要性;

　　make money：站在厂商的角度，讨论盈利的重要性;

　　范文

　　Some people assert that medicine companies should focus on helping poor people, whereas other believe that the business is entitled to make money. It looks to me that both views are not antagonistic to each other; it is only a question of different emphasis.

　　On the one hand, it is easy to understand why some people take it for granted that the pharmaceuticalcompanies should prioritize social responsibility over profits. From the perspective of the advocates of this, one thorny problem that exhausts many governments is the unaffordable cost of medical treatment, which is reckoned to be culpable for millions of unnecessary deaths every year. For example, in developing economies like China, people are reluctant to go to hospitals just because they cannot afford the medicines. Considering this, the medicine should first serve as something to cure diseases and save lives, then a product to earn money.

　　On the other hand,plausible though it is, the argument is not justified enough to silence theshareholders of those medicine corporations, whose concerns lay more emphasis on the survival of their business, the rewards of investors, and the employment as well, not to mention their tax contribution to the government, which in turn, could be used to subsidize the public medical services. As well as these pragmatic determinants, a more important factor we cannot afford to ignore is the enormous investment for researching new drugs, which definitely comes from the income of selling medicines. How could these companies maintain new projects without stable economic return?

　　In conclusion, it looks to me that both arguments deserve their justifications in certain circumstance.From the perspective of patients, pharmaceutical businesses should not allow the prices above certain level so as to make it affordable for the masses who need them most. On the other hand, these companies deserve modest profit to invest on the sustainable research for the new products, which in turn willbenefit everyone.

　　相关词汇：

　　Be entitled to 应该

　　Antagonistic 矛盾

　　Pharmaceutical 制药相关的

　　Thorny 棘手的

　　be culpable for 对负责

　　plausible 看似合理的

　　silence 使闭嘴

　　survival 生存

　　subsidize 资助

　　pragmatic 实用的

　　justifications 合理性